There are two points of interest which I've emphasised in red for the benefit of the reader.
First, ACT obviously hasn't gotten over its crushing defeat in last year's election and is still claiming to have 5 MPs.
It's been two months, guys! Time to let go and get over it!
Ordinarily I'd have put that kind of fossilized display down to neglect for a poorly used asset; but seeing as somebody's seen fit to update the site with Banks' Address in Reply (a fossilized display of a different kind), it would appear there's some wilful obfuscation going on.
I'd tell ACT to stop living in the past, but that seems rather harsh on a party which doesn't have a future.
It would also be rather hard given their choice of Caucus Member, and the fact that Banks' speech seems substantively to be a pining ode to an imaginary 1990s.
Yes, you read that correctly. Somebody has actually developed fond nostalgia for the 90s.
The second point of interest is that it's finally dawned on John Banks why the House empties whenever he gets up to speak.
As the man himself puts it, "there is a belief that not every Member of Parliament has something worthwhile to say."
Hat-tip to Frankly Speaking.
Hat-tip to Frankly Speaking.
Heh heh heh... Nicely written, Curwen. As a matter of fact, dammit, e ven better than my prose...
ReplyDelete